First edition of the first substantial criticism of Beccaria's Dei delitti e delle pene (1764), published only a year before. With deep implications for philosophy, politics, and economics, Facchinei's book contains one of the earliest instances of the term "socialist" in print (the first in Italian) and an early reference to the concept of the "invisible hand". Facchinei (b.1725) was a Benedictine monk based in Venice. His Note ed osservazioni ("Notes and Observations") was "a desperate and extreme defence of the traditional world" (Venturi, quoted in Reinert, p. 139), in which the author attacks the tendency in Beccaria's political thought to exclude religious considerations. The book is the most radical rejection of the jurist's ideas, including those relating to capital punishment and torture, contract theory, political freedom, and egalitarianism. Facchinei takes issue with what he describes as "socialist" views (first on page 9 and again later): the call for a world-wide secular and democratic revolution based on the idea that there could exist a perfect society generated from the consent of truly free men. Rousseau's Social Contract was, Facchinei believed, the germ of such "socialism", a belief he judged to be disproved by historical records. What history teaches us, Facchinei observes, is that the rise and fall of powers has been determined by the law of force, prevailing "by such circumstances and combinations that one can discern in this process (judging justly) the work and contribution of an invisible, yet very powerful hand" (Reinert, p. 140). Facchinei's work was in turn criticized by Pietro and Alessandro Verri, who defended Beccaria in their Risposta (1765), and by many others afterwards. Reinert notes that "history has not been kind to Facchinei, who complained late in life of having been 'hated and defamed', not to mention forced into 'silence, slandered and oppressed' for his Notes and Observations" (p. 136). This copy contains some marginal annotations by a contemporary Italian reader who systematically disagrees with the contents, attesting to the popularity of Beccaria and confirming the backlash Facchinei received. His ownership inscription on the title page reads "Di Federici", perhaps indicating that "Federico" was his name, but otherwise his identity remains elusive. The comments are between pages 86 and 122, in which Facchinei argues in favour of the death penalty. In a few instances, the reader insults Facchinei: for example, at page 96, he writes "Taci, ignorante" ("Shut up, you ignoramus"), and, at page 119, "Questa � una filosofia da sciocchi" ("This is a philosophy for fools"). Other comments are more elaborate, expressing agreement with Beccaria: for example, at page 122, he states that the death penalty "is not useful, not fair. He who condemns someone to death in cold blood, without any personal gain, is more guilty, more condemnable, than someone who killed his enemy out of hatred". Melzi II, p. 239; not in Einaudi. Sophus A. Reinert, "Enlightenment socialism. Cesare Beccaria and His Critics", in B�la Kapossy, Isaac Nakhimovsky, and Richard Whatmore, eds, Commerce and Peace in the Enlightenment, 2017. Octavo (199 x 134 mm). Original carta rustica, traces of manuscript paper label on spine, edges untrimmed. Elaborate woodcut head- and tailpieces. Edges rubbed, a little loss to binding at spine ends exposing gatherings underneath, some spotting, small stain, and pencil marks on covers, couple of small ink smudges in margin of title page, paper flaw to upper margin of leaves E8-F1 causing small hole, gathering G a little loose, occasional faint finger mark or minor spot to contents, else bright and clean. A very good copy.